Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers can be sent to mailbag@racer.com. We love hearing your comments and opinions, but letters that include a question are more likely to be published. Questions received after 3pm ET each Monday will be saved for the following week.
Q: This I get: Can’t really build a new chassis without knowing what kind of engine goes in it. IndyCar doesn’t have an agreed-upon engine for 2027. Ergo, no new car for ’27. This, however, I don’t get: What is Penske expecting to happen in the extra 12 months?
New manufacturer? Hasn’t the train left the station? Ford and Hyundai (Genesis) are doing prototypes; Stellantis is headed to NASCAR, and by now Toyota must have automated its “the answer is still ‘no.’” Who’s left?
Doesn’t that leave mainly Honda’s Ilmor-made, branded by anybody plan? The concept seems to have worked well enough in NASCAR Trucks to entice Ram. Leaving an ERS or no ERS decision to be negotiated. I fear that without some dramatic change, the Marshall Pruett Gap Year solution will be the answer by default.
Al, Boston, MA
Marshall Pruett: Could be some other options for 2028, Al. Been working on a next-IndyCar-formula piece for about eight months and have parked it and waited and rewritten it three times as major changes to the plan have emerged. I’d hoped to get it out last week, but my goal is to have it done before the end of the month.
Q: During Road America Practice 1 on Friday we noticed several cars locking up heading into Turn 5. The tire noise was absolutely drowned out by a very shrill high-pitched sound that was in tandem with the lockups. It was never mentioned on the broadcast. Can only assume it’s the hybrid, but any more insight on that? Instant full regen?
Mike, Elkhart Lake, WI
MP: Possibly. Hard to say without being there to hear it.
Q: With the new F1 movie and the newly announced Days of Thunder sequel in the works, I can’t help but feel IndyCar gets left out. How do you feel about this? We saw how the big screen helped NASCAR’s popularity soar to even greater heights; one can only imagine the shot in the arm it would be for IndyCar. With so much history around the 500, so many potential storylines over the decades, it’s mind boggling.
Jeff
MP: There are some cool documentaries in the works that have IndyCar/Indy 500 elements, but I’m not aware of anything that’s modern or current in development like what F1 is to Formula 1. The F1 movie opens with a bunch of IMSA as well; Porsche put on an awesome private screening of the film in Watkins Glen last week before the Six Hours race. But yes, to your point, there’s an awful lot to choose from at Indy and in the world of IndyCar; maybe Driven’s legacy is that it killed any interest in coming back to the series.
Q: May we please have a primer on the IndyCar hybrid system? i.e How and when can it be deployed? How can it/should it be deployed as a weapon.
What do teams and drivers think of it compared to the previous push-to-pass option?
David
MP: The system debuted in competition 51 weeks ago. Written at least 10,000 words on it since then, so RACER.com’s search function is my first recommendation. [Try Part 1 and Part 2 of “RACER’s inside look at IndyCar going hybrid” first. -Ed.]
Teams think it’s a second push-to-pass system, and it’s required in the rules, so it’s used like any other piece of performance-enhancing technology.
Q: Thanks for answering my question a year or so ago about the Buick Indy engine program. I really appreciated that.
My wife and I had the privilege of taking a tour of the Petersen Automotive Museum last summer, and in the vault I happened to come across what may be my favorite open-wheel race car of all time: The All-American Racers’ Eagle 997 from the ‘99 season. It’s the one of the few Eagles I am old enough to have seen race, and getting to see it in person and study it up close made me appreciate the design of the car and what mavericks Dan Gurney and company truly were/are even more.
I know it’s hard to say, but in your estimation, just how good were those particular chassis? Obviously, AAR knew what they were doing, and I always felt it had potential, but between the Toyota engine at the time and the Goodyear tires, it seemed to be a perfect storm of all the wrong ingredients. I know Robby Gordon did moderately well with an Eagle simply by running Firestones, but if a CART team with, say, Firestones and a Ford or Honda engine had run one, could it have been a consistent contender for points finishes? Or were they specifically designed to house the Toyota engine?
Drew, Birmingham, AL
MP: It clearly had potential but suffered from the same thing that Lola and Penske were going through at the time with having a limited number of models in the field while going up against 20ish Reynards. There’s just no way to compete when facing that kind of chassis development onslaught.
I’d like to think it would have been a frontrunner with Hondas and Firestones, and both would have been much better options. Whether it could have matched Reyanard is an unknown.

All American Racers’ Toyota Eagle 997, driven here by Alex Barron, sure looked the part but while its uniqueness made it interesting, it was also a liability. David Taylor
Q: As we hit the halfway point of the IndyCar schedule, who have been the surprises and disappointments of the 2025 season?
Pedro
MP: McLaren moving to the top of the Chevy camp. Penske being in a growing state of disarray. Coyne and VeeKay making a lot of teams look silly. Kirkwood. Palou. Honda going unbeaten. Shank and Rosenqvist rocking. Ericsson mired in another brutal season. Foster looking better than most rookies in recent years. RLL being faster but no better in the championship.
Q: If you are starting a new team and have to pick either Colton Herta or Kyle Kirkwood, which do you take?
Brian Henris, Fort Mill, SC
MP: Kirkwood. He’s second in the championship while Colton’s 10th. Ask the same question a year ago and it would have been the opposite answer. Ask it next year and it could be different again. All you can do is go on today’s output, and in his fourth season, Kirk seems to have found something new and different. Colton’s had more adversity, but there have also been more days that are good but not great. Kirk’s got the hot hand in 2025, so that’s the obvious choice.
Q: Wow – I’ll just say I was expecting a snoozer at Road America, given how some of the other IndyCar races have gone this year, but that was one of the better road races IndyCar has staged in a long, long time. It had everything that makes a race great, even if Palou won. My initial reaction is that maybe the heat and conditions contributed to a race that strained the cars in such ways as to allow the driver to really drive the machine. And, hopefully that bodes well for some of the racers later this year, Mid-Ohio, Laguna Seca, and Portland in particular. The cars sliding around, but not punishing aggressive driving was great.
Other snap judgments: MSR/Rosenqvist are on it, Palou is just special this year, the cartoon anvil has either moved from Andretti and the 28 car to Newgarden’s or has spawned a child that is attached to JoNew, and Ferrucci is coming into his own, which is great to see.
I guess, I need a question, since it is a Mailbag, after all… so do you think the weather conditions helped make Road America as good as it was? And, if so, does that give us hope for fun as the summer heats up?
Taco Montgomery
MP: The heat was a factor, but the tires were mostly up for the challenge so there wasn’t advanced degradation on either compound. Cautions and the timing of those cautions are important, because they can open up multiple strategy options that lead to the diverging fortunes we saw on Sunday.
Q: Santino Ferrucci coming home third and producing some results! I used to dislike him as a driver but now with that beer chug at the end of the race, he’s won me over.
Now… what if we put him in a Penske instead of Malukas?
Not that Stefan Johansson
MP: We know Will Power thinks highly of Santino. But don’t discount Malukas. He’s still extremely young and inexperienced at 23 years old with 45 IndyCar races to his credit. Most of those – 34 – were with Coyne. If we’re talking about learning at higher-tier team, he’s got a half season at Meyer Shank and a half season at Foyt. To be sitting 12th in the championship, just 10 points behind Ferrucci, is a hell of a thing.
He needs another season at Foyt to clean up the litany of mistakes that limit his ability to deliver better results. Purely a case of needing time to reach more of his potential. He’s 10 points behind Ferrucci, as noted, and is only 16 points shy of Penske’s McLaughlin. Impressive stuff.

Would Power still think as highly of him if Ferrucci took his ride? Joe Skibinski/IMS Photo
Q: I have been saying since early on in the year that I am not convinced the weight of the hybrid – in and of itself, at le ast – was the cause for the relatively dull start to the IndyCar season. I felt this way due to one simple fact: Last year’s hybrid races weren’t anything like them. Now, three races removed from the Indy 500, and in the wake of the most entertaining road race of the season to feature an Alex Palou victory, I am more convinced than ever of this.
The real issue that caused the dull start of the season was teams not coming fully to grips with the best way to set up cars with the hybrid weight, rather than the hybrid weight being the insurmountable hindrance its recently been made out to. Ganassi was the first to wrap their brains around it, leading to a dull start of the season, and now others are catching up, leading to a return to form for the series even when Palou wins.
I don’t find it a coincidence that this return to form began with the first truly exciting race of the year at the Indy 500. Indy is the definition of “adapt for fall,” and the sheer amount of practice time finally gave most teams enough data to piece the last few details together. Now most of the field has setups that do allow them to attack in the way they couldn’t before, and we get back to what we expect from IndyCar – and right as we get into the more consistent period of scheduling on top of it.
I for one couldn’t be happier to see this return to form.
FormulaFox
MP: The only issue with the theory is the teams and drivers have said the opposite, which we’ve documented. Teams raced on road courses, street courses and ovals with the hybrid weight in 2024. Spent insane amounts of money working on R&D programs, simulator programs, and learned a ton more in the track testing they completed, and weren’t lacking in knowledge of how to set up their cars from St. Pete through the Indy GP.
Teams make engineering strides in every season, so that’s the norm. But they, collectively, didn’t just unlock some new hybrid-weight-defeating setup secrets. The 500 was quite good, but the same weight-related issues and limitations were spoken of by drivers after the race. Cautions and the passing opportunities that come from restarts brought some entertainment into the 500. Same with Detroit. Same with WWTR. Same with Road America.
The new Detroit layout has been one where an abundance of mistakes are made (seven cautions in 2023, eight in ’24, and a relatively tame five earlier this month), which creates restarts/passing/excitement. WWTR had four cautions to add to the restarts/passing/excitement dynamic, which also introduced the first big race/fuel strategy finish of the year as leaders peeled off for splashes to make it to the checkered flag.